Off Cursor. Onto production.
Cursor builds incredibly fast, but AI-generated codebases often suffer from file bloat, duplicated logic, and 'spaghetti' component trees. Our job is to take the prototype that proved the concept and apply rigorous engineering discipline so it can scale with a real team.
The structural reasons.
Codebase lacks architectural structure
No test coverage for critical paths
Component duplication makes styling inconsistent
Target stack. Defaults, not dogma.
These are the choices we'd recommend for most Cursor migrations. The audit week is where we adjust for your specific constraints — compliance, team skills, existing infrastructure.
Cursor gotchas. All known.
The patterns specific to Cursor that catch teams trying to migrate themselves. We've seen each of these enough times to plan for them up front.
Messy commit history
We usually squash and re-organize the history into logical milestones.
Unnecessary dependencies
AI often hallucinates packages or adds redundant libraries. We prune the package.json.
A typical Cursor migration.
Yours will land within a few items of this. The line-item quote from the audit is what makes it specific.
- Full codebase audit and type-check enforcement
- Restructure folders into atomic design patterns
- Add comprehensive test suites
Other migrations we run.
Ready to leave Cursor?
Audit week is where it gets specific. Five business days, fixed price, real plan.